Reverse Dysmorphia: When the Mirror Lies the Other Way
Reality isn’t a fixed point we finally reach. It’s a story that evolves alongside our capacity to hold it.
When people talk about body dysmorphia, they usually describe a phenomenon where the mirror exaggerates their flaws — where they see a bigger, less acceptable version of themselves than what "objectively" exists.
I first learned about this as a teenager, when my mom suggested that maybe the way I viewed myself wasn't lining up with reality.
I remember trying to wrap my mind around it: Was the visual input itself wrong? Was I literally seeing something that wasn't there? Or was I just judging the input differently?
I didn't just want it to just be about judgment.
Judgment felt too subjective, too flimsy to trust. I wanted confirmation that my eyes were lying — that this was a physical malfunction, something definitive.
At the time, no one could give me a satisfying answer.
The Two Pathways of Seeing
Modern neuroscience has revealed that vision is not a passive process. Our brains are not simple cameras taking in a single reality. Instead, we have two pathways when it comes to seeing:
Bottom-up processing: Raw sensory data — light, shape, color, movement — gets transmitted from the eyes to the brain.
Top-down processing: The brain filters, interprets, and makes meaning of that raw data based on memories, expectations, emotions, and cultural context.
In other words, what you see is never just what you are looking at. It’s what you are looking at plus everything you have been taught to believe about what you’re looking at.
Both pathways are real. Both pathways are always active.
And this understanding — that perception is a collaboration between the external world and our internal world — became essential to my own body image recovery.
When Dysmorphia Flips
In my twenties and thirties, I moved away from the classic body dysmorphia story. I no longer believed I was seeing myself as bigger than I was.
I preferred to embrace the reality: "No, I'm just fat. I don't need to trick myself into thinking otherwise and call it dysmorphia."
It felt grittier, less self-deceptive.
But it was only safe in my cognition – I knew it was true, but remained shocked by the images telling me the same truth.
My cognition was realistic. But my embodied emotions were actually under-registering the changes in my body. My emotions were only able to hold a more acceptable version of myself — a version tethered to a body that was smaller, younger, more aligned with cultural ideals.
Even though I intellectually knew I'd gained weight, my internal imagery buffered me from the full confrontation of it.
It wasn’t that I thought I was actually seventeen again. It was that I still preferred to identify myself as someone who used to have an eating disorder, because it cushioned the simple and present reality of just being bigger.
Sometimes body image distortion isn't about seeing an ideal. It's about seeing what is safer.
This is how defenses work. Our nervous systems aren't neutral. They're wired to protect us from being unsafe.
The Grief of Seeing Clearly
Seeing photos of oneself unexpectedly is difficult for many of us. I don’t think it’s just because of what we’re looking at — it’s also because our brain is caught off guard. There’s no time for interpretation.
It’s just: that’s you.
Not the version you’ve edited in your head. Not the version you’ve practiced accepting by turning certain ways in the mirror. Just the raw data, before your brain can reorganize it into something safer.
That moment can feel like a betrayal. Not because the image is “bad”, but because it’s casual and indifferent. It doesn’t care what story you’ve been telling yourself.
It reminded me of watching an elderly couple kiss on their driveway recently. I realized the man didn’t see his wife as “an old woman” in the way a stranger might. He saw her through the lens of shared history; through memory and affection. His vision was layered with stories.
And for me, the grief isn’t just about weight. It’s about realizing how much energy I’d spent trying not to see. How many years I walked around with a protected self-image, still identifying as the person I used to be. Not just for vanity, but for safety.
It preserved a link to who I thought I was — someone more aligned with cultural ideals, someone who once belonged in spaces I’m no longer automatically welcomed into. To my past, to the people who knew me when. That’s the part of me who lives in the part of my youth I want to fix.
To let that image go means confronting the ways I’ve changed, the things I’ve lost, the things I missed, and the stories I tell myself to make it bearable.
It’s not just about what the mirror shows. It’s about what it takes away.
That’s the grief of clarity.
But there’s also something else here. The more you stop bracing against reality, the more you can begin to live in it.
And even though that reality might not be what you dreamed up in your twenties, it has its own kind of freedom. Not the freedom of being seen and admired; not the freedom of being able to fix mistakes or pursue different outcomes. It allows for the freedom of no longer needing to.
So What Do We Do With Reverse Dysmorphia?
Here are three anchors I lean on:
Confront Reality Gently
Yes, look. Let yourself see the body you have today. But do it without turning it into a moral verdict. Weight gain is not a character flaw. Aging can be emotional. It’s okay to look.Recognize the Filter — And Its Humanity
Know that your mind will always filter what you see. You are never looking at yourself through a single lens. Interpretation is part of being human, not a glitch to get out of the way.Question Whether "Objective Truth" Even Exists
If every act of seeing is layered with meaning, then maybe the goal isn’t to find "one true version" of your body. Maybe it’s to build a relationship with all of its dimensions.
It’s good — and necessary — to update our sense of reality as we grow. But even what we call “reality” is shaped by what we’re ready to hold.
Seeing ourselves more clearly is progress, yes — but it’s still filtered through the lens of what our nervous system can bear.
Wow, I never thought about reverse dysmorphia, thank you for this. Because I always feel really good about myself and my body until I see a photo and I'm shocked every time. I even think, maybe it's just a bad photo and not accurate. But then I look at the other people in the photo and they look accurate to what I see in real life, so I think, "Huh, I guess this IS what I look like." I have also lived in environments for the past two years without access to a full length mirror, which doesn't help.
Stef, can you help me with this concept please?
Thank you as always for sharing your insights and thoughts.
I have read through the article several times. I am thinking this: on one hand I am not to believe in what I actually see as my lens is distorted.
But....
I may also be seeing a better version of the truth, because my nervous system is protecting me.
So...
What if I view myself 'honestly' and what I see is a protected version of myself. Could I actually look worse than the image that I see in the mirror and in my head? Xx